New Orleans, Atlantis Redux
The NYT says that we are nation reeling from the disaster that is the aftermath of hurricane Katrina. I for one have no sympathy for those etouffe’ stuffed, hillbilly, frenchmen. These idiots looked at a bowl shaped area, that is below sea level, in a region with lots of hurricane activity, and decided that it was a good place to live. Am I the only one who finds this thought process suspect? Now that this cretinous decision making has come back to haunt them like a high school yearbook picture, I am supposed to feel empathy for these schmucks?!?!
To top it all off, we as taxpayers have to foot the bill, not only for their rescue and welfare, but to help them rebuild!! In the same fucking place!! How dare these people put their hands out, demanding that we enable their lack of real estate prowess with our money! I also have a hard time having any respect for a city when its inhabitants have no respect for it. The widespread looting is evidence enough of that.
I say no rebuild and no federal money. These people made a pathetically poor decision, let them take some personal responsibility and stop looking for everyone else to foot the bill every time they act like the uneducated ignorant masses that they are.
POSTSCRIPT 9-01
House Speaker: Rebuilding N.O. doesn’t make sense
Thursday, 2:55 p.m.
By Bill Walsh
Washington bureau
WASHINGTON - House Speaker Dennis Hastert dropped a bombshell on flood-ravaged New Orleans on Thursday by suggesting that it isn’t sensible to rebuild the city.
“It doesn’t make sense to me,” Hastert told the Daily Herald in suburban Chicago in editions published today. “And it’s a question that certainly we should ask.”
Hastert’s comments came as Congress cut short its summer recess and raced back to Washington to take up an emergency aid package expected to be $10 billion or more. Details of the legislation are still emerging, but it is expected to target critical items such as buses to evacuate the city, reinforcing existing flood protection and providing food and shelter for a growing population of refugees.
The Illinois Republican’s comments drew an immediate rebuke from Louisiana officials.
“That’s like saying we should shut down Los Angeles because it’s built in an earthquake zone,” former Sen. John Breaux, D-La., said. “Or like saying that after the Great Chicago fire of 1871, the U.S. government should have just abandoned the city.”
Hastert said that he supports an emergency bailout, but raised questions about a long-term rebuilding effort. As the most powerful voice in the Republican-controlled House, Hastert is in a position to block any legislation that he opposes.
“We help replace, we help relieve disaster,” Hastert said. “But I think federal insurance and everything that goes along with it… we ought to take a second look at that.”
The speaker’s comments were in stark contrast to those delivered by President Bush during an appearance this morning on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”
“I want the people of New Orleans to know that after rescuing them and stabilizing the situation, there will be plans in place to help this great city get back on its feet,” Bush said. “There is no doubt in my mind that New Orleans is going to rise up again as a great city.”
Insurance industry executives estimated that claims from the storm could range up to $19 billion. Rebuilding the city, which is more than 80 percent submerged, could cost tens of billions of dollars more, experts projected.
Hastert questioned the wisdom of rebuilding a city below sea level that will continue to be in the path of powerful hurricanes.
“You know we build Los Angeles and San Francisco on top of earthquake issures and they rebuild, too. Stubbornness,” he said.
Hastert wasn’t the only one questioning the rebuilding of New Orleans. The Waterbury, Conn., Republican-American newspaper wrote an editorial Wednesday entitled, “Is New Orleans worth reclaiming?”
“Americans’ hearts go out to the people in Katrina’s path,” it said. “But if the people of New Orleans and other low-lying areas insist on living in harm’s way, they ought to accept responsibility for what happens to them and their property.”